10 Responses to “Three Lenses Every Photographer Should Own”

  1. sp says:

    For new photographers, I’d recommend the versatile 18-200 with stabilization. You should add lenses as you start developing affinity to particular types of photography. Even after you add other lenses to your arsenal, the 18-200 will still serve as a good “vacation lens” for situations where you want to travel light.

  2. Douglas Tanner says:

    I only own one lens, a 10-22mm wide angle. Works for me!

    But, I did use a 17-85mm for the first year while I was working out what type of photography I liked.

  3. Ed V. says:

    A 24-70 (or 28-75) f/2.8 on a crop sensor makes a great portrait zoom and short indoor sports tele. I own the Tamron version for my Canon 40D.

  4. Dennis says:

    Any opinions on a 24-70 on a crop sensor?

  5. B says:

    The three lenses every photographer should own, so that every photographer can make the same kinds of photos as everyone else.

    Not everyone wants to express themselves with closeups of fortune cookies, or wide angle landscapes, or telephoto shots of sports, or whatever.

    There are no lenses that every photographer should own.

  6. Khürt Williams says:

    Don’t forget about crop factor. The 50mm prime will most likely be more like 80mm with a 1.6 crop factor. A 35mm lens may be better.

  7. Bjorn says:

    I doubt that most people new to photography will spend the money on a couple of f2.8 zooms plus a macro.

    That’s cost me (shooting Nikon) about $3000+CDN in lenses if I shoot Nikon glass. I’d go further and say that lenses everyone should own are either:

    1) A lens which will allow you to take the kind of photos you want
    or
    2) a 50mm f1.8 equivalent (i.e. 30 or 35 mm on a 1.5 crop factor)

    Better yet, spend $40 on a film rangefinder (not a Leica) and learn to work to the lens that it came with. Now _that_ will teach you something :)

    Good article for discussion. Good for everyone to _think_ about what photography means to _them_ :)

  8. Eric says:

    Most people can’t afford a decent zoom lens. They’re either cheap and compromise on image quality or they don’t and they’re expensive as hell. And most people considering “more lenses” is probably already aware of the flaws in their 18-55mm kit lens.

    Simply, every photographer should own:

    1. A good wide angle. A dedicated wide angle or ultrawide lens will simply have better image quality at 18mm than a kit zoom lens, and won’t break a budget too badly.

    2. A fast mid-range prime. A 50mm f/1.8 or 1.4 is cheap and is a good walk around lens, striking a good balance between reach and field of view, while offering that shallow depth of field you’ll want for most subjects. But anything between roughly 35mm and 85mm is just as well, depending on your style and whether you’re dx or fx. Odds are this lens will be good enough for most macro work, and a few of them even offer 1:1 macro.

    3. A telephoto. Admittedly, it’s hard to find a good, affordable telephoto, but just about every photographer needs one – at some point you’ll be shooting either an event or wildlife or something where you’ll really need the reach.

    If you carry those three, you’re covered for most anything you might wind up shooting, and you won’t have to compromise on image quality to get it.

  9. matejMM says:

    Fast prime is essential…

  10. mihai says:

    I started off with a 18-200 VR. Added a 50 f/1.4 and later a 11-16 F/2.8. These days, I guess I would prefer to have a fast 35 prime instead of the 50, but can’t bring myself to sell it. It’s just that good :)

Leave a Reply

Powered by WP Hashcash

Security Code: