2 Responses to “My experience with a micro-4/3rds camera – (Panasonic GF1 Review)”

  1. Jeff says:

    I have an Olympus E-410 which is a 4/3 camera with an optical viewfinder and a mirror and the rest. It’s pretty good, but I’m still planning to upgrade to something with a larger lens selection, larger sensor and better ISO range and higher pixel count.

    That said, if I had the same camera, minus the mirror, minus the lens length (even the kit 24-42 is too big) and got the same/better image quality it would be a very happy second camera. Especially for my wife who prefers to shoot with live view.

    These would make an ideal second camera, or even beginning DSLR for lots of people. Also, the 35mm magnification of the 4/3 sensor is about 2x instead of 1.6x – so the effective lens length of anything is about doubled. Good for some things, not as good for others I guess.

  2. Richard says:

    I think the micro 4/3’s manufactures are missing a massive market by not offering a built in view finder.
    With a view finder these cameras would be perfect for people who want a digital rangefinder style camera, but cant afford to shell out for a Leica. Even if they didnt have a rangefinder focusing system, and just had a built in electronic view finder it would make them ideal for photojournalist and street photography.
    I know that if Olympus did a Pen with a built in viewfinder I would be very tempted to buy one.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WP Hashcash

Security Code: